a camping trip of ridiculous proportions

Sprint Booster – Is It Worth It?

last updated 10/02/2017

A sprint booster, also called wind booster, pedal box, idrive, throttle controller, pivot controller, electronic throttle controller, e-drive, plug n go module, pedal commander or throttle re-mapper, is a device that intercepts the signal between the accelerator pedal and the engine management on a fly by wire throttle. It takes the signal from the pedal and outputs a modified signal to the engine management. Claimed benefits include faster engine response, elimination of throttle delay, better performance and the ability to unleash the true potential of the engine. How do they work and do they really enhance performance?

This article is not a product review. I have not used a sprint booster. This article is purely analysis based on the following:

  • information provided by sprint booster manufactures
  • understanding of how throttle by wire works
  • understanding of general process control
  • an excellent experiment that you will see in the references section below

Anecdotal evidence from people who have tried sprint boosters does not invalidate this article. This article is consistent with technical information provided by sprint booster manufacturers. I’m certain that the manufacturers themselves understand how their own product works.

What does the Sprint Booster do to the Throttle Signal?

A fly by wire throttle is simply a voltage signal. The voltage tracks the position of the accelerator pedal via the accelerator pedal transducer. Pushing the pedal harder yields a higher voltage. The engine management system measures the voltage and thus knows the position of the accelerator pedal. A typical arrangement is shown in the schematic below.

ecu schematic

A sprint booster sits between the accelerator pedal position transducer and accelerator pedal position input as depicted in the schematic below.

ecu schematic with sprint booster

The only interface a sprint booster has to the ECU is via the accelerator pedal position input. So clearly the only thing that the sprint booster can influence is the accelerator pedal position that the ECU receives.

The sprint booster increases the rate of change of voltage vs pedal position. So for a given increase in pedal position, the sprint booster yields a larger increase in voltage compared to when stock. It fools the engine management into thinking you are pushing the pedal further. This is depicted in the chart below showing pedal position vs voltage.

sprint booster output voltage

The graph above illustrates the voltage signal that the engine management receives as a function of accelerator pedal position for both with and without a sprint booster. You can verify these graphs by looking at the documentation provided by sprint booster vendors. Actual sprint booster voltage profiles will not perfectly match the example I’ve provided. The exact shape of the curve doesn’t matter, the sprint booster is compressing more voltage change into less pedal travel.

So when stock, half pushing the pedal will yield half voltage. But in the example above with the sprint booster installed, half pedal will yield full voltage and the engine management will interpret the pedal position as being 100%. Pedal position between 50% to 100% is redundant – pushing the pedal more than 50% makes no difference and the useful pedal range is reduced.

There’s a few important conclusions based on this analysis alone:

  • A sprint booster can manipulate only the accelerator pedal position. Nothing else.
  • Accelerator position can only ever be between 0 and 100%, with or without a sprint booster.
  • Without the sprint booster, any accelerator position between 0 to 100% can still be attained according to the actual position of the pedal.
  • The perceived engine response delivered by a sprint booster can be completely emulated by appropriate positioning of the accelerator pedal.

Claimed benefits

Sprint booster vendors claim that the product eliminates throttle delay by cranking up the voltage or somehow making this signal “stronger”. This is not true. Any changes in voltage propagate from the accelerator pedal transducer to the engine management at close to the speed of light. This is the case with or without a sprint booster. The delay is so small it’s immeasurable.  The sprint booster makes no difference to how quickly the engine management receives and interpreters the signal from the accelerator pedal. The engine does not respond faster. It cannot respond faster. The only difference is the engine management thinks the pedal is being pushed further than what it really is.

Some people are extremely satisfied with their sprint booster, reporting something like “the engine response was so good I smoked the wheels pulling out of my driveway.” But what has really happened here? The driver has accelerated harder than he or she wanted to. Essentially the driver has lost control of the vehicle. The vehicle has done something the driver did not want to occur. This is not a benefit. Actually it’s a disadvantage. Without the sprint booster, the driver could have still smoked the wheels by pushing the accelerator pedal harder. With the sprint booster, the driver has lost precision in throttle control. Throttle control becomes jerky rather than smooth. In fact compressing the range of throttle voltage into a reduced amount of pedal travel means the throttle control is approaching a more on / off type arrangement.

Some people explain that, when they turn off their sprint booster, the car feels extremely sluggish. Over time they have learned to adjust their foot control for the overly sensitive accelerator pedal response. It will take time for them to re-learn how to drive with the sprint booster turned off.

Another claimed benefit I’ve heard reported is that sprint boosters improve fuel economy because you aren’t pushing the throttle as hard to achieve the same speed. This is completely ridiculous. People that make such stupid claims shouldn’t be allowed to post on internet forums. They make people dumber. The reduced amount that you push the accelerator is perfectly offset by the amount that the sprint booster amplifies the voltage. Further, precision control is lost and driving style becomes more jerky, which increases speed variability, increases fuel consumption and increases wear on the vehicle.

Actual Benefits

The benefit of a sprint booster is that you do not have to push the accelerator pedal as far to achieve the acceleration you desire. You are saving some foot effort. There is no difference between installing a sprint booster to changing your driving style to operate the throttle in a more jerky fashion, for example flooring it violently when taking off. The only improvement in throttle response is the time it takes to push the accelerator pedal further. This is not reaction time of the driver. It is not the time it takes to decide to floor it. It’s the extra time required to move the pedal a bit more, given you are already moving it. I estimate for example it may take an extra 1/10 of a second or 100ms for the throttle to travel from 50% to 100% if you are already moving the throttle from 0% to 50%. So in a typical scenario where you want to accelerate hard, you’ll be better off by something in the order of 1/10 of a second with the sprint booster installed. Unless you accidentally break traction due to the reduced throttle precision, in which case you’ll be faster without the sprint booster. So if possibly saving 1/10 of a second is important to you, or saving the effort of moving your foot is important for you, then a sprint booster may be a good idea.


Installing a sprint booster means the available travel in the accelerator pedal is not fully utilized. There is a large dead zone where the voltage sent to the engine management is 100%. This means you’ve lost precision in throttle control. You’ve lost resolution. Your ability to make small adjustments to throttle has been degraded. You can’t feather the throttle.

Using more throttle and having a more jerky driving style will cost you more fuel, wear out your car more and increase your chances of having an accident. It also encourages poor driving habits – for example accelerating hard then braking hard in stop / start traffic rather than just driving at a steady speed.

Offroad, a sprint booster makes it difficult to control your vehicle. Movement of your foot caused by vibration or bumps translates to much larger accidental changes to throttle then what would occur with a standard setup. Your ability to make small changes to throttle is compromised, yielding an amateur like driving style over rough terrain. Many sprint booster users will de-activate their sprint booster when offroading. Actually some vehicles automatically do the exact opposite of a sprint booster when low range is engaged in order to improve precise vehicle control. The disadvantages of sprint boosters whilst offroading are also present when on the road, but the effect is more pronounced offroad due to the rough terrain and the requirement to precisely control speed and torque whilst offroad.

Throttle Filtering

A sprint booster cannot circumvent the filtering performed in the ECU. Whether people describe a sprint booster as a “proportional controller” or talk about “digital setpoints” or “controller gain” or “ramp up” or “tuning” is irrelevant.

The accelerator pedal transducer is a potentiometer with a voltage across it. It is not an intelligent device. There are no time delays or filtering performed within the accelerator pedal transducer. The filtering is done in the ECU. Why? Why would the vehicle manufacturer add complexity, expense and points of failure within the accelerator pedal transducer when that capability is already there in the ECU? Add a few lines of code and it’s done in the ECU without any extra hardware, cost or potential points of failure. Also, filtering removes information. You want to remove information only at the point where there is no disadvantage to removing it. In the case of the throttle position, the sensor usually consists of two potentiometers which both report directly to the ECU. This means the ECU is able to detect problems which could pose a safety risk. High frequency noise, step changes in signal or transient discrepancies between the two signals can be used to rapidly detect problems. Filtering at the throttle transducer would mask these issues. Diagnostic ability would be lost. Instead, the raw data is read from the device and interpreted and manipulated as required using software within the ECU. The raw voltage signals from the transducer go to the ECU where diagnostics are be performed. After that the signal is filtered and processed within the throttle controller.

So filtering occurs within the ECU, not within the accelerator pedal transducer. This means it’s physically impossible for a sprint booster to circumvent the ECU filtering. The filtering is occurring within the ECU, after the sprint booster. The sprint booster is not changing the ECU’s software.

What does the ECU filtering do and how does it impact the performance of a sprint booster? Engine management may filter the incoming voltage signal to make the throttle control smoother. It’s called a low pass filter. Fast changes are filtered out. High frequencies are filtered out. This manifests as a maximum rate of change that the throttle can respond to. So even if the voltage signal from the accelerator pedal instantaneously jumps from 0 to 100%, the actual throttle will be limited in how fast it can react so that it takes some minimum amount of time to open fully. As an example, lets pick a value – say 0.2 seconds. This means that no matter how quickly you change the voltage signal, if you change it at a rate faster than the rate equivalent to 0 to 100% in 0.2 seconds, it makes no difference to the actual throttle response. So engine management filtering actually masks the response of a sprint booster. Some people argue that the sprint booster will help overcome the engine management filtering. This is impossible. The filtering is occurring after the sprint booster. The engine management does not know whether the voltage signal is coming from a sprint booster or directly from the accelerator pedal. It will always limit the rate of change in throttle the same way. It is incorrect to suggest that the engine management’s filtering somehow enhances the response from a sprint booster. It will always dampen the response. So the time saving of 0.1s from having to move your foot less will actually result in less than 0.1s improvement to throttle opening time. Part of the increase in speed from the sprint booster is filtered out. Faster signals get filtered more. If you are already at the limit without the sprint booster then adding a sprint booster will make no difference at all. So, for example, if you can already move the accelerator pedal from 0 to 100% in 0.2s which corresponds to the maximum rate of the throttle filter, then adding a sprint booster and reducing the time it takes for the accelerator position to reach 100% by 0.1s will have absolutely no impact to the actual throttle opening time. The filter is already saturated before adding the sprint booster.


When it comes to pros and cons of a sprint booster it largely comes down to user preferences and opinion. In my opinion sprint boosters don’t offer any benefits, provided you have adequate articulation of your foot and leg. People perceive improved response with a sprint booster but, if they desired that response without the sprint booster, all they had to do is operate the accelerator pedal aggressively. It is simply a voltage amplifier and you can only ever have between 0 and 100% throttle regardless of how you amplify it. The response provided by a sprint booster can be perfectly replicated by pushing the accelerator pedal further, minus the almost imperceivable time it takes to move the pedal a bit more. A sprint booster adjusts the voltage signal that indicates accelerator pedal position. It’s extremely clear that the scope of a sprint booster’s control is limited to adjusting the apparent position of the accelerator pedal. Some sprint booster owners will argue the response can’t be emulated by pushing the pedal harder and faster. Most certainly it can.  The system is very simple to evaluate. The laws of physics are extremely clear. The manufacturer themselves confirm it in their technical data. There is no claim to be made to the contrary unless the physics can be explained.

So in my opinion there is no advantage. Why be forced to be jerky with the throttle when you could have a choice? Why throw money at an yet another electronic gizmo when it may not be necessary? The perceived advantages are not really there, but the disadvantages are real. I prefer having precision control over the vehicle’s throttle. I prefer driving smoothly, efficiently and safely. And I prefer spending less money on gizmos and more money on things that make me happy like getting out in nature and camping.

That doesn’t mean you shouldn’t get a sprint booster. Many people like them. In fact I’d suggest that most people who’ve tried one like the result. People like the feel of the throttle response. Regardless of the fact that they can be perfectly replicated by pushing the pedal further, if you enjoy driving with a sprint booster then it’s a good thing. Try one out and see if you like it. However it is not a performance enhancement and won’t improve engine response or acceleration.

Possible Safety Issue

I doubt sprint booster manufacturers have performed detailed analysis of the accelerator pedal position transducer failure modes and how the ECU software detects and handles those failures. Therefore it’s possible that a sprint booster could mask a problem with the accelerator pedal and leave you with a stuck throttle. Similarly the sprint booster itself could fail and result in a stuck throttle. The risk is low, I’ve never heard of it happening, but it could happen.


It’s very hard to find any good experiments on sprint boosters. There’s simply far too many uncontrolled variables to make a valid experiment and the effect of confirmation bias and placebo is too strong. People are eager to validate their investment and will usually confirm everything the marketing has trained them to believe. This is not unique to sprint boosters, it happens with all consumer spending. As an indicator for how strongly people want to confirm, consider these two points:

  • Some sprint booster vendors / manufacturers clearly state that a sprint booster will not improve 0 to 100km/h acceleration times.
  • Some sprint booster users claim that a sprint booster does improve 0 to 100km/h acceleration times.

Consumers are inventing their own advantages to validate their spending, even though it is contrary to the manufacturer. Similarly sprint booster users believe a sprint booster can somehow circumvent ECU throttle processing despite the sprint booster’s only interface to the ECU being the accelerator pedal position.

There is one experiment that is really good. It measures directly parameters from the ECU. It eliminates nearly all the uncontrolled variables. It confirms everything in this article. Everyone interested in sprint boosters should read it. Check it out here:


Even some sprint booster manufacturers validate what I’ve stated in this article. Most use vague and ambiguous language but some are more honest. Here is one example:


See also:

Why No Diesel Performance Chip?

Diff Locker vs Traction Control

Exhaust Pipes: Is Bigger Better?

Do You Need a Suspension Lift Kit?

How to Drive on Sand

How to Catch Australian Salmon

How to Catch Barramundi

Design Compromise

back to 4WD, Touring and Camping

more articles by outbackjoe


143 thoughts on “Sprint Booster – Is It Worth It?

  1. Reality is the measure of truth, not your physics!

    If the actual experience says it works, then it does!

    That’s why I’m ordering tonight and see for myself, if it doesn’t work i will return it.. as simple as that.

    I am not looking for improved performance, I’m looking for improved responsiveness.

    • Hey reality bites, Not sure how your reality works, but when studies are done huge effort is placed into accounting for placebo and confirmation bias since they are such powerful effects. So experience may not be what it seems. But if it makes you happy then that’s a good thing, if you are happy with “improved responsiveness” that doesn’t actually exist.

      It doesn’t matter. A sprint booster is a feel good device. If you like it then it’s a good thing. Otherwise send it back. Everyone’s happy. I already mention this in the article.

      • If you race cars, then you would realize that you need instant throttle response, so by just touching the pedal a small amount, and getting instant engine response, instead of the delay of a half second (I have the sprint booster), then you can actually race your car at a track. If you don’t race cars (karts, formula cars, GT cars, etc.), then you know nothing, and shouldn’t be writing this article. People who just drive for fun and not in competitions know nothing about driving, and will never realize the true potential of their car, which can only be done by taking off the factory limiters, which are meant for the lousy (average) driver that has no experience racing open wheel cars.

      • Wow John clearly your superior experience means I should not write this article. Your comment is a mastery in logic and science. I’ll take down the article immediately.

        So racing is about how fast you can apply the throttle and not about how close you can get to the limit? What a revelation! Are you sure you’re not Michael Schumacher? I guess racing cars should have their throttle removed and an on / off switch installed instead. That would really optimise the throttle response.

    • I must say I am on the fence about these products. I agree with some points in this article for sure, but the sheer weight of numbers of those with a positive experience is also hard to ignore. I have a new Pajero Sport 2.4 Diesel and the throttle lag is pretty ridiculous, and the only annoying thing about the car. I have just ordered a similar unit, with the only intention being to eliminate or greatly reduce this lag. If it works I will report back on my experiences, if it does not prove effective with this lag I will also report back (and send the unit straight back). Hoping it will improve this issue, and I can honestly say my experience will be objective, I have no intention of justifying a purchase that does not work, I’d much rather go the other way and get a refund and advise others not to make the same mistake. Will post up my findings, positive or negative when installed, my intention is to achieve what is shown in sprint booster’s “marketing video” above, fingers crossed I wont be needing any witchcraft.

      • Hey Jizza yeah report back your findings. But what makes you think you’ll have less bias than others? Really anyone with a modern vehicle pursing this sort of gizmo has a bit of a bias towards consumerism and validating their spending. Pretty much every gizmo doesn’t “work”, if you define work as providing any lasting happiness.

    • The mere fact that you do not own or have even tried one negates the whole article. I have been racing for years, drag racing primarily, up to and including top alcohol dragsters that go 275mph plus in the low 5 second range in a quarter mile. In racing, you want to get the throttle plates open as fast as possible. Period. Why ? Because who ever can get from the start line to the finish line the quickest wins. Still with me ? I own a modified Nissan 370z. On a drive by wire car, the TBI’s open at a certain rate or speed predetermined by the ECU. You can mash your foot down as fast as you want, and they open at a pre-calculated speed. Installing the sprint booster made a huge difference in 0-60 times. I tested this on a live and real environment. I have a computer application gps driven that measures 0-60 times. I turn the sprint booster off, make a run and it’s 4.4 seconds. I turn the sprint booster on, put it in red mode and it goes 4.0. I did this many times. It came out the same every time. I will say your article is well written. However, your conclusion is dead wrong. Coming from a racer, in a live environment, not a theory, but in a car with a sprint booster installed.

      • Ahhh so the best drivers in the world have mastered the art of pushing the throttle quickly. Now the secret is out, we can all be legendary drivers just like Michael Schumacher.

        What happens if you break traction?

        How does the sprint booster circumvent the delay given the delay is done in the ecu?

        How do you explain that sprint booster vendors, including the one I link to, admit that a sprint booster will not improve 0 to 60 time? Do you realize how outrageous and hilarious it is to invent a feature that even the vendors clearly state does not exist? Only a consumer sucker of the highest caliber could do that.

  2. Joe like your work.
    I have told a few people why not just push the Accel pedal harder? LOL

    • Yeah works for me. Plus its consistent with my philosophy of fewer gizmos, less working to pay for them, more camping.

      • Looking at Sprint Booster for a while, never used, but you can say I’m biased towards it’s benefits. Specially because it can be turn off or uninstalled at any time.

        Say you are doing rallycross. You want to take advantage of each corner to gain that “less than 0.1s”.

        From: “So, for example, the time saving of 0.1s from having to move your foot less will actually result in less than 0.1s improvement to throttle opening time. Faster moving signals get filtered more by a low pass filter.”

        You don’t need the original smooth throttle because you exiting corners at full throttle drifting.

        If there’s a human mechanical time to be lost for pushing from 0% to 50% and another from 50% to 100% Sprint Booster seems to give you an advantage after each corner. I’m no physician so I can’t say if it’s ~0.1s as your example or higher or lower…

        Still it seems to be there and the only way to replicate it would be to change your throttle model or reprogram the ECU.

      • Hi Daniel. Yes there are advantages as I identified in the “Actual Benefits” section. In most racing applications a sprint booster would not be useful since you do not want to break traction but rather find the limit. The less accurately you can control something, the bigger margin you need to keep from the limit. Actually this idea of being close to the limit is textbook optimisation which is exactly my field. Reduce variability by improving control, push the limits harder. A sprint booster degrades control and increases variability.

        Even in an application where you need full throttle immediately all the time, the driver will anticipate the limit of when full throttle can be applied based on the characteristics of the vehicle. So apart from unanticipated full throttle requirements, I don’t think you will see a 0.1 second advantage coming out of every corner. But a sprint booster could still provide a marginal advantage I suppose, at the expense of poorer throttle accuracy which could be a disadvantage at different parts of a corner or some other scenarios.

    • YOu can push the pedal to the floor, but you will still have about half a second delay. Those who know how to drive (who have actual on track racing experience in open wheel cars), would know that half a second will only slow you down. That’s clear to me.

    • You can push as hard and fast as you want, but its only going to open as fast as its programmed to. There’s the issue. Installing the SB is like modifying you cable or rod link to go 1:1. People have been using a bell crank to help get the throttle plates open faster on carbs for years. Its no different.

  3. outbackjoe, I agree with everything in your article. You are spot on!

  4. the whole review is base on your opinion ? not fact ??

    i would like to see you buy a sprint booster, put it on your car, drive it & write a review.

    • Hey dude nah it’s based on analysis and science and some guy’s thorough experiment on sprint boosters (see under references). Feel free to leave some of your “facts” in the comments. Nah I won’t be buying a sprint booster, jerky throttle response won’t make me happy. How would trying a sprint booster yield any facts? Wouldn’t that just produce someone’s opinion on it?

  5. Joe,

    I come across this searching for a way to eliminate the “lag” I experience in my throttle response. Being in a field that deals with electronically controlled components I understand and agree with what you have said here. For me it is not about the acceleration but the actual response time from the initial push of the pedal to the point of action. I don’t feel there should be that much travel. You don’t expect that from your braking so why would you from your throttle? The same is true of the reverse action. I notice while driving that my vehicle maintains its speed far longer than anticipated once off throttle. I found this troubling and consider it a safety hazard. I was goofing off one day and attempted to “rev” my motor and then it all clicked. I assume the manufacturer, to decrease the possibility of damage, has set the programming to not allow an extreme change in RPM . Once off the throttle the RPMs do not instantly fall off. They slowly fall which is what is occurring while in “D”. The ECU filtering makes perfect sense when talking response time of the throttle (on or off). Obviously the only way to fix my problem is the ability to change programming. This may also help someone understand a bit better what you are saying.

    I still prefer hard point throttle linkages.

    • Hey David cheers for your feedback and explanation. Yeah a sprint booster wont fix your problem, you need to modify the ECU software. Easier said than done.

  6. I find it interesting that you claim science and mechanics to support your opinion and yet have not actually used this product. I have fitted a Windbooster to my 2008 D4D Manual Prado for almost a year now. The effect of the Windbooster is immediate and increases the response of the throttle. The level of increased response can be determined by the setting of the Windbooster. After reading your article, I removed the Windbooster and tried to mirror the throttle response by increasing throttle pedal travel. I could not match it. I also noted that without the Windbooster, I had the jerky throttle that comes standard with this vehicle. Reconnecting the Windbooster in fact eliminates this problem. I also have a DP Chip and Beaudesert 2.75″ exhaust fitted. The Windbooster makes the car easier to drive with a smooth take up of power. I found that, over time, by adjusting the setting to match the desired engine response gave me the best results. I have not increased my fuel consumption to any noticeable degree. The only problems I found was that it interferes with the Cruise Control (now does not work at all) – I am taking the unit back to have it checked at point of purchase, and if I have it set too high when towing my caravan, it increases the amount of smoke under heavy throttle. I think your article might have more credibility had you tried one and came to the same conclusion. My experience suggest you might have come to a different conclusion. I wouldn’t be without it.



    • Hey Garry glad you enjoy the feeling of your sprint booster. Not sure what your point is with your statement “My experience suggest you might have come to a different conclusion”. My conclusion is the sprint booster is just a voltage amplifier that fudges the accelerator pedal position. Are you disputing this? Even though some sprint booster vendors verify this in their documentation? Even when presented with the experimental data that I link to? How do you substantiate this? There is no way testing a vehicle with a sprint booster would make me think the sprint booster manufacturer’s own documentation is invalid or the results of the experiment I link to are invalid.

      If you accept that all it does is amplify voltage then you accept it can be replicated by pushing the accelerator pedal further. There is no alternative scenario.

      Trying something and reporting your feelings on it doesn’t prove anything. People report feeling better when taking a placebo. Add on top of this confirmation bias where one wants to validate their investment and you have a double whammy of bias towards a positive outcome. How would this help the article? All I am saying is that a sprint booster is a voltage amplifier. If you like the feeling of a sprint booster then that’s great. You liking your sprint booster is not in conflict with my conclusion that it is a voltage amplifier.

  7. What I am saying is that your article suggested that the effect can be replicated by pressing the throttle further. I suggest if you had tried one you may have come to the same conclusion as I did, that you can’t. You can’t press it fast enough to replicate the effect. I eliminated the “placebo” effect by turning it off after having used it for a long time, drove the car, and then reconnected it. I have also tested it with a friend driving my car and made adjustments without he being aware of those adjustments. I accept what the technical aspects of the product are, it was explained to me when I bought it. The vendor fitted it to my car, obligation free and said try it. I did and it was astounding. I had my wife and daughter in the car and they could feel the effect when I changed each setting. If you are prepared to publish a comment on a product I think only proper and responsible to have tested the product.



    • My conclusion is that a sprint booster is just a voltage amplifier that alters apparent pedal position. The fact that a sprint booster can be emulated by pushing the pedal harder is not my conclusion, it’s a direct consequence of it being a voltage amplifier. If you accept the technical aspects then you accept that it can be replicated by pushing the throttle further, minus the very short time it takes to move your foot a bit more. There is no alternative. Any throttle position can be generated both with and without a sprint booster. If you give me a voltage “x” that the sprint booster delivers then I can give you the exact same voltage “x” by pushing the pedal further. This is true for any value of x from 0% to 100%. It’s a basic logical proof.

      Yes your passengers can feel jerky operation of the throttle. They can feel it with or without a sprint booster.

      This article is not a product review. You cannot buy every product in the world and test it. Before you buy something you need to go through some sort of process to determine you want to buy it. Do you agree? This is my evaluation process as to whether I think it’s worth throwing money at a sprint booster. Like many of my articles it’s also about getting people thinking more philosophically about what they spend their money on. Consider what are you trying to achieve and how spending this money helps. Don’t just jump on the band wagon.

    • Exactly. To get on your bandwagon about a product that you have never even tried in a real world environment, it nothing short of senseless and comical.

      • Haha you’ve really outdone me with such a masterpiece of science and logic. Yes, it’s senseless and comical. I’m glad everyone understands now.

  8. So let you physics explain why I can drive up a hill in 5th in 76 series V8 cruiser foot flat at 60kph and my tps on scangauge reads 69 the car barely moves.
    Turn the windbooster on and repeat and the tps reading is still 69 yet has no trouble at all

    • Hey Dave it’s called placebo and confirmation bias. And a good dose of poor experimental method. A sprint booster’s only interface to the vehicle is the throttle position. This is verified by sprint booster manufacturers. What you describe is not physically possible.

  9. “Some sprint booster owners will argue the response can’t be emulated by pushing the pedal harder and faster. I am certain it can. The system is very simple to evaluate. The laws of physics are extremely clear. There is no claim to be made to the contrary unless the physics can be explained.”

    I had e drive “sprint booster” whatever they called, on my pajero/challenger sport 2.5. According to my human moto skills I cannot replicate power mode 1-9 features and impossible to replicate economic mode 1-7 step lower than normal without Sprint booster gizmo. I have tried my heavy foot, padel harder, throttle faster, push further whatever human foot can do on throttle, and I end up with unmanageable throttle especially when not only ankle, but all joints from my butt to my toe involved. I had jerky control with my moto skill and may be take years to train. I looked stupid and rackless. Thanks to this device, gadget, gizmo that makes heavy foot manageable on my toe.

    Does not matter what ever law of physics it used, most important it is useful, it performs just like what had been explained generally. This Sprint Boost, E-Drive, Potential Booster, wind boost, turbo throttle whatever we named it ia a device that can tune your throttle range and management to suit your skills and liking. For such purpose it makes your car perform better if you hate the normal or original throttle range. Performance is not only torque, horse power, speed in general but includes Good Setup. Beast power but loose tracking, bad suspension setup equal to bad performance. Proportional setup according to our own driving skill equal to comfort, safety and satisfaction. This gizmo I recognised as a good tuning device to make your car perform better and to tame your heavy foot.

    And the v2 version does not interfere with my Cruize Control and also it cheat very well the ECU till no CEL indicator appears. I also noticed, it acted like a throttle calibration device eliminate most of my sloppy old throttle padle. No wonder having this device is like added features to your Cruise Control which work on the same kind of physics. Frankly I also cannot replicate the exact speed of my Cruise Control especially to maintain consistent speed up hill without over throttling or under throttling.

  10. Excellent reading. These should come with a tin hat and a ride on a unicorn..

  11. -Outback joe
    Great article…. Its funny how ppl can’t figure out the difference between throttle response and throttle position .

    • Lol. There’s a DELAY of a half second, even if you push the pedal to the floor immediately on a stock system. The sprint booster does work, by eliminating the delay, so you get 100% voltage immediately. With a stock drive by wire system, 100% throttle would be delivered a half second after the pedal is pushed to the floor, at the earliest. Only, people who can’t actually drive (everyone who doesn’t have open wheel racing experience like Formula Mazda, Indy lights, Indy car, etc.) don’t know that. It does make a difference for those who know how to control the throttle, as they’ve had many hours experience learning to get the most out of their race car. For people who just get their drivers license and think they know how to race a car, I can see why they would think there would be no benefit.

      • Hi John

        Thanks for your repeated explanation that only someone who’s had racing experience exactly according to your requirements would have any chance of understanding a sprint booster. It’s flawless logic and is a great contribution to this article, really helping us understand what is going on. I also like how you specifically addressed the content of the article to back your position. Some people just waffle on about completely irrelevant stuff like their credentials.

        Any chance you could explain where the 0.5 second delay comes from and how the sprint booster circumvents that delay?


      • Yeah. The .5 second delay comes from the factory throttle control module cpu. I can see why they did that because it will help mediocre drivers (everyone without real Karting and open wheel experience) drive on the street. I tried pressing the throttle all the way down with the factory unit and there is no wheel spin. But my explanation should be obvious to most people. Your article doesn’t address the FACT that there is a delay. The stock.module will still get 100% throttle response, but AGAIN, the difference is the DELAY. Do you understand yet? Do you understand the concept of a delay of .5 seconds versus no delay? And of course obviously a good driver will then not push the throttle to the floor immediately. (I thought you might try to make another dumb argument about how the lack of delay will just make for the car spinning it’s tires and not moving very much.) He will know the correct amount to push the throttle to get the most amount of traction when racing. So, in case you still don’t understand, the sprint booster allows you to remove any delay that the factory module has, and so puts out 100% throttle voltage when the driver presses the throttle to the floor or close to the floor, depending on which mode you set it at.

  12. You forgot the fact that there is a delay of almost 0.5 seconds from the time the driver presses the peddle to the floor and the time that the engine receives 100% throttle. Everyone missed that point except for me. Here for the 5th time is my explanation: with the stock module, the driver presses the peddle to the floor. The voltage that the throttle motor receives is instantly about 25%. From 0 seconds to 0.5 seconds, the throttle motor receives 25% throttle then gradually up to 100% throttle. That 0.5 seconds IS A big delay to those who can race cars (go and see if you can race a pro Mazda open wheel car. If you can’t then you can’t drive. It’s that simple. See indycar.com for details on the pro Mazda series) With the sprint booster, (set on race mode) when the driver presses the peddle anywhere from about 50% to 100%, the throttle motor receives 100% voltage similar to what the diagram above shows. If you can drive, then that is what you want. So a real driver would be pressing his foot the correct amount to get the most amount of traction and the least amount of wheelspin when racing. If you still don’t understand, I’d be happy to explain it a 6th time.

    • Hi John. Great replies. Concise and informative. Not waffling at all. You sound like someone who really knows their stuff. Your understanding of a 0.5 second delay is second to none.

      Can you explain how the 0.5 second delay is introduced by the throttle and how the sprint booster circumvents that delay?

      • Do you mean you are too stupid to understand what 0.5 seconds is or are you too dumb to know what the concept of a delay is?

      • Neither. My question is exactly what I asked in my previous comment. Is your personal attack and diversionary waffle because you don’t have an adequate answer?

        The throttle pedal position sensor is a resistor. There is no delay in a resistor.

        I want to understand the physical process behind the delay. How is there a delay through a resistor and how does a sprint booster circumvent that delay? Or, if the delay is introduced downstream of the throttle pedal position sensor, how does the sprint booster circumvent that delay?

        Also can you explain why information from sprint booster manufacturers indicate the sprint booster simply reduces the pedal travel required to achieve 100% throttle? Do the guys who make this stuff not know how their own product works?

        My questions are somewhat rhetorical because I’m certain you have no adequate answer, especially since I have basic laws of physics on my side. Your logic that you’ve repeated several times is “My credentials mean I’m an authority and I say there’s a 0.5 second delay”. Not good enough dude. Useless information. You’ve wasted my time and everyone else’s. At least I’ve had a chuckle at thinking up some sarcastic answers, which more intelligent readers can appreciate when sifting through your waffle.

  13. Nice try but I’ve used them and no amount of adjusting your driving style can delver what the Sprint Booster does. It certainly reduces gas pedal delay contrary to your bogus analysis. Go to the Porsche forums where you’ll find how annoying the factory throttle lag on these cars are. When you read the experiences of Porsche owners who installed the SB you’ll find out that the lag is eliminated. The nay sayers like you come up with all kinds of lame claims but when they finally try one themselves they completely change their tune if they are honest.

      • I don’t understand why aspirin works but when I use it it does. If it didn’t work I wouldn’t use it.

      • You might not know the mechanics of exactly why putting gasoline in a cars gas tank has an effect on how far it can keep going but you KNOW FROM EXPERIENCE that filling up the tank with gas compared to running out of it relates to your being able to go anywhere.

      • We all know that if we eliminate fluids from our diet we will die. Many haven’t a clue why exactly that is, or how our bodies utilize it. We know when we are very thirsty that drinking fluids will satiate that thirst. Not knowing why or how isn’t required for knowing that something works. There are endless examples. As far as finding out exactly how a Sprint Booster works I suggest you contact any number of car performance parts retailers that sell them online.

      • I already know how it works dude. If you want to learn how it works then read my article and the couple of links. One of the links is to a sprint booster manufacturer and is perfectly consistent with my article.

        The funny thing about aspirin is, if you give people a placebo, half of them think it still works!

        Actually for a gizmo for a car the placebo effect is even worse. People are addicted to spending and are itching to throw their money at anything and then confirm the marketing exactly how the marketing has trained them to. Plus there’s confirmation bias to even further skew the result.

  14. I totally agree with Say Whut. I used the sprint booster too. It has nothing to do with placebo effect. It really makes the throttle response smoother. To be fair to the manufacturer, there should not be bashing of the product until you have tried it.

  15. Outbackjoe is someone who thinks he is smart but really he is not. Someone who reviews items based on readings and no actual tests. I read his article on Chips, and looks like he’s better of riding a stock pony (yes the animal)

  16. As I’ve stated before I don’t know how it works but it does and you cant duplicate it’s performance without installing one. That is the case for my Toyota Yaris which has been wonderfully transformed by it. Those who say it cant increase the quickness of acceleration are mistaken but you cant know that until you experience it first hand as I and many others have. I doesn’t just feel faster. It is faster in terms of acceleration. That being said it is not all good news as there are a bunch of lemons being distributed. I have bought three and returned the two units for my Porsche Cayman because they malfunctioned terribly!. I tried to order a 3rd but the warehouse that receives the orders is making things hard for me which is something potential buyers should be aware of. Like I said before, you can return them but you can also be jerked around and treated almost as if you are to blame for the bad units you are returning. Obviously they do have a significant quality control and attitude issue. I think if you are lucky enough to actually receive a functional unit you’ll love what it does, but if you receive some bad ones like me and others have it could seriously mess up your car to where you could get stranded or worse. If you Google you can find a number of disasters from people installing bad units in their premium cars. Some really awful things can happen if you install a bad one. Unfortunately purchasing one of these units is a bit of a gamble. I’ve got two bad ones out of three so that must mean that there are a significant amount of duds being circulated so be cautious until you are sure that the unit you install is a good one. Try to aggressively accelerate from a stop or when passing other cars because the RPM’s could instantly spike and stick there which is very hard on your motor! That’s what happened with my Porsche and some others units too.

  17. WoW! I can’t believe there’s a current discussion on this item. There has been countless tests and discussions on the performance of this product for many years. Here’s a fact. Some cars have more programmed throttle delay than others. Usually you will find longer lag in higher performance vehicles, producing high amounts of torque. The delay, or lag is deliberately programmed in by the factory for powertrain warranty purposes. This can be adjusted out with software communicating with the vehicles computer module ONLY! When you combine throttle lag / delay with a manual transmission, it can be a bit awkward from a dead stop. The clutch responds precisely to what your left foot is doing, while the throttle….nnnnot quite. It’s a never ending learning curve because the delay can be a bit inconsistent. When you install a Sprint booster in one of these cars, the following is to be expected. You feel a big difference in pedal to throttle ratio (approx 70% accelerator pedal input gives you 100% throttle opening), but the lag, or delay is not effected at all. Still, some do like it, and some have it removed for return after less than an hour of use. To each his own I guess. Can’t wait for the implementation of a servo operated clutch. Hey Joe, next project…..???$$ joesclutchchiperoo.com? Search sprintbooster on Youtube. They do demonstrate, and claim that it will eliminate throttle delay! Maybe if you glue it really good the the cars computer module? Also check out sprintbooster.com, or sprintboosterusa.com for info, not sprintboostersales.com. They are just a retailer. A division of Mini Mania. Not the best tech info source for accuracy. Just to purchase. Drive safely, unless you’re on a closed course of course.

  18. Wow, very entertaining from everyone. Joe, I reckon you are a legend mate. John you are most likely also a legend (on the race track at least) but I if I had to pick a winner in this debate I would award it to Outback Joe. I rarely ever read forums but I maybe I will from now on because this has been a cracker.

    Incidentally Joe, I appreciate your detailed thorough research on the product and regardless of the fact that you did not “field test” the product; I believe that your explanation is logical particularly given that it is consistent with the manufacturer’s claims.

    Some of the people who have contributed to this forum have lost sight of the fact that you have voluntarily taken the time to research this product and put forward a credible point of view with good intentions and in good faith. I for one appreciate the efforts of people like you who take the time to provide an objective perspective. No offense to the supporters of the sprint booster product. Everyone is entitled to an opinion. As Joe said; for those that own the product and are happy with it; that’s great, happy days – drive on.

    As I mentioned at the start, very entertaining forum and this is the first time I have written on a forum.


    • Hey Kenny cheers for your friendly comment. Yeah people get defensive about what they’ve spent money on. It’s not about proving to other people that you’ve spent your money wisely. It’s about being happy.

      Not that I usually toot my own horn but I reckon the literary genius of this site will be hard to replicate on other forums.

  19. I just installed one on my KK Cherokee CRD and it pretty much does what Joe says it does. With every increase in level (P1,P2 and P3) the throttle just becomes more responsive (touchy). I drove around experimenting on the street for a few hours and now just leave it off most of the time.

    Although, each level does have about 10 increments and I found if I turn it right down on P1 it does help me in 3rd when accelerating. 3rd on my little rig tends to bog down and RPM’s drop quite fast so it does help accelerate a little smoother without me having to put my foot through the floor.

    However I have no doubt it would cause the Jeep, or any vehicle for that matter to use more fuel and it’s defiantly not a “power mod” and doesn’t unlock anything from what I can tell.

    Saying all that I think it will be a great bit of kit in certain circumstances off road when you need a quick hit of instant power ie climbing rocks, assents or plowing through sand or mud. But in terms of practical benefits on the street for me personally there aren’t many…. I’ll just leave it off until I take her out of 2WD.

  20. Joe, you have to understand for some people, it might take full 1 seconds to press the pedal to the floor. Assuming pedal box amplifies 100%, it could save them 0.5 seconds to reach maximum throttle position. In this case, John is correct in that pedal box increases performance of the driver regardless of whether ECU delay is bypassed or not.

    Everybody has different response time on their body and maybe racer john’s head to leg response time is unusually longer than other people.

    John might not be the best racer but I can see pedal boxes can be helpful to some people.

    • Yeah it could be useful for some. Sprint booster won’t help reduce head to leg or head to foot response time. It will only reduce the pedal travel time. This happens after any processing delays or reaction times.

  21. I’ve just found this thread and read it and, also coming from a process control background designing fuel systems for gas turbines plus a bit of a car freak, found it very interesting. With respect to how a sprint booster (or similar) works and the fact that it is basically an amplifier I agree 100% with outbackjoe’s conclusions which, as he also states, is consistent with the results of the empirical testing.

    However, if we accept then that for the same pedal travel (regardless of human response times) we will see an increased throttle pedal position output then we also have to accept that under exactly the same human response and input conditions that this increased output signal occurs quicker. As we are all relatively conditioned in terms of how we drive out vehicles (think how things feel different when you change cars) then this could absolutely feel that the sprint booster is making the car accelerate faster however the truth is simply that the output from the throttle pedal reached a higher level over the same length and time of pedal travel. Which certainly could be replicated by the foot along by essentially moving it quicker and further. The issue here then revolves around our conditioning with respect to how we apply pressure to the throttle and how repeatable we can make this. On cars with along throttle pedal travel I could see all these factors working together to in effect simulate a quicker, heavier foot and also doing this more consistently once again providing a ‘feeling that the car is accelerating faster’ i.e. more air/fuel for the same pedal travel.

    Obviously the physics cannot be argued with regardless of how good a driver you are but one element that has been overlooked is the throttle pedal filtering in the ECS and how the output of this filter responds to a change in input. Depending on just how intelligent this is could also have an effect on the actual throttle body position particularly where a more rapid increase in input signal is experienced. We all know that adaptive control will dull throttle response over time for sedate drivers but maintain quicker response for more aggressive drivers through filtering so there is certainly evidence of more intelligence than a simple time constant filter. I personally don’t know enough about the type of filtering used in car ECU’s but it is feasible that on the basis of more output from the same human input (i.e. throttle pedal travel over time) and filtering that is intelligent enough to modify it’s filter characteristics to reduce the time constant from throttle pedal input to throttle body output could result in faster engine response for the same set of inputs.

    In summary I can see why people believe their car is accelerating faster with a sprint booster.

    • Hey northernpar thanks for your explanation, some good points. I don’t reckon the presence of an adaptive filter will impact the result, since the filter will respond the same to rapid changes in input whether it’s come from a sprint booster or from a faster foot.

  22. And that’s my point. Say the ECU filtering uses some form of derivative control where the filter output will be determined by not just magnitude of input signal change but also rate of input signal change (which I suspect is the case or similar for adaptive filtering) then rate of change of throttle position becomes relevant.

    In this case i agree that a faster foot could replicate a sprint booster but a faster foot cannot replicate the effects of both a sprint booster set to max AND a faster foot. This would ultimately provide the quickest achievable rate and magnitude of change to the ECU filter and therfore the quickest possible throttle body response time.

    So, theoretically a sprint booster could improve engine response time (dependant on a number of other factors) albeit As the times we are talking about would be in the fractions of a second I’m not sure just how noticeable this would be in the real world.

    Another point worth considering is if the sprint booster also provides some signal conditioning which would either benefit range or linearity of the throttle pedal position signal. One of the previous posters appears to be able to get more power when flat out up a hill with the sprint booster fitted. Assuming that this is true (and I have no reason to believe it isn’t) and there aren’t any other environmental factors (air temperature, altitude, humidity etc.) then we can only assume that the sprint booster is conditioning the signal and providing a greater maximum range output.

    So, in summary the manufacturers claims may not be the ‘snake oil’ that they are being made out to be but who in their right mind would believe a salesman anyway!

    • Either the filter saturates, or the throttle body actuator saturates, or at best you maybe get a 100ms improvement. Exactly as described in the article. Filter specifics are irrelevant. Even if it uses rate of change to preemptively open the throttle it can only improve by the amount of time it takes to do it yourself by moving your foot. Which is not much time at all. There are many reasons to not believe the chap thinking he gets more power. Confirmation bias. Addiction to spending. Poor experimental method. Lack of control of variables. Placebo.

  23. I don’t agree I’m afraid. Filter specifics are hugely relevant as I have pointed out and I’m not sure why you refer to filter saturation? I’d be interested in your technical explanation for this. If I had the time or the inclination I would model my theory and demonstrate it mathematically to showthe real impact of filtering with or without derivative applied as there is nothing preemptive about this type of process control. It is a direct function of the rate of change of the input signal as transferred to the output signal. 3 term control 101 theory.

    I’m sorry but I thought we were having a discussion based on engineering facts and first principles and through this I have demonstrated that a device such as this could improve engine response even if it is only 0.1 seconds. It does appear that you are firmly entrenched in your views and when any credible challenge is presented you once again refer back to the science of human factors when in fact I have factored the human into the complete process and not elected to focus on only one element.

    If I may make a suggestion before I sign off, if you are going to preach your position as the gospel then your evidence needs to be based on a lot more than it currently is. You state your position is factual but are quite happy to adopt supposition or refer to the relatively wide science of human factors if it serves your purpose to defend your entrnched position. Maybe you should be more open to discussion rather than attempt to close down any conversation that contradicts your assertions.

    The simple fact is that if a human presses the gas pedal as fast as he/she can then by virtue of what you have already proved the 100% position will be reached quicker when a sprint booster is fitted. That may only equate to a fraction of a second with respect to the gas pedal indicated position but regardless it is faster and would therefore translate into a quicker response from the engine to the requested change. These facts cannot be disputed as to do so would also undermine the basis of your position. With respect to the complete process control then the ECU transfer function to throttle body position is not just relevant but critical as this will constitute the majority of any delay. Filter saturation has nothing to with it, these are digital systems therefore not prone to saturation. So how the ECU ‘adapts’ to the new signal characteristics from the sprint booster could have a very real impact on time lag and propogation resulting in a very real change in engine response characteristics a la adaptive control.

    Sorry to be blunt but i thought i was engaging in a technical discussion and sharing of theories as oppose to a ‘pissing contest’

    Over and out.

    • I’m confused. The article says a sprint booster can save you pedal travel time, which may be around 100ms. Nothing to do with filtering. It’s clearly indicated in the article that there is a time saving. Not sure why you think I’m denying that.

      You either save the full pedal travel time (say 100ms) or something less depending on the filter. The best possible case is the full pedal travel time saving.

      You’ve explained that there are different types of filters but you haven’t explained how the accelerator pedal position filtering could enhance the response of a sprint booster. But then I’m not even sure if that was your point since your last post sounded more like you were talking about pedal travel time, which I already agree can be reduced by a sprint booster.

  24. I just bought an F150 and it came with the sprint booster installed. I would compare the off, green and red mode to my motorcycles wet, sport and race mode. Although the motorcycle is doing much more than throttle position (fueling, timing, traction control, throttle position etc.), the “effect” is somewhat mimicked. I agree that you can replicate the outcome with more throttle effort, but, I like being able to switch between more and less throttle effort depending on road conditions (wet/snow and dry). It actually “feels” less responsive in green mode because I have to push the peddle down more to get the same outcome. Now if we didn’t adjust our pedal effort and kept it the same and just changed the sprint booster mode from green to red, the difference is very noticeable and I like not having to put more effort for the same outcome. Again, I know its just an effort thing, but it kind of works for me.

  25. The only reason I installed one is actually a very good one…… to get rid of the horrible 2 second lag in my Genesis, which appears to be normal for us Genesis owners. I swore it was going to kill me or somebody else because you would step on the accelerator just to have nothing happen for a full 2 seconds before the car decided bolt foward into traffic… now that problem has been eliminated all together and it’s because the accelerator to throttle is that much quicker.

    • I used the have 4 cylinder turbo Genesis coupe, and the turbo lag was atrocious (which is ridicoulous in a moden car). I got used to revving it more before I let off the clutch. It sounds like the SprintBoost actually smooths that out for you. It was odd that Hyundai did not alter the throttle response to address the turbo lag, but I suppose that would have sacrificed fuel economy or something.

  26. My Audi S4 has drive settings that allow adjustments to the throttle response. I.e. just set the drive mode to dynamic, and you get the same effect. And yet the SprintBooster is marketed and is a popular purchase for this car. Idiotic. If you splurge on the fancy infotainment system, you can monkey with this even more (and a host of other things you should not be touching). Also idiotic–unless you are a racing mechanic and are consistently driving in race conditions, it is fairly impossible that you would out-tune the German engineers who set up your vehicle.

    Thanks for this article.

  27. Hey All – I just purchased one for my 2004 BMW 325 CI and it has been a great product. I love how the vehicle responds and it has completely changed how the vehicle performs. I was totally underwhelmed with the 325 Ci’s throttle response and was thinking of trading the car in but now I feel I’m driving a much sportier car. This product works! For those that say to push harder on the accelerator, it is not the same effect in the least, and no it is not a placebo effect.

    • Two years ago i read a lot about sprint booster, saying it does not work, just change the throttle curve, placebo… push harder and you get the same result.

      Then I got an used 2011 335i with the product already installed, but i just found out it was there (inactive) 3 months later. Then I turned it on and holly moses, it was another car… the first thought was “let´s replicate just pushing harder with it off”. No, the result the booster offer CAN NOT BE REPLICATED without it. yes, it makes the lag shorter, and yes, it accelerates more than just stepping further. Have turned it off and on dozen of times to test, because I was biased to not believe in it, but the reallity proved me wrong, the product does what it claims, it completely changed the way the vehicle performs, even more fun to drive, because a 335i has plenty of fun already.

  28. This article is a joke. Sprint boosters work as advertised and make the vehicle much more responsive and fun to drive. Pushing down harder on the pedal does NOT replicate the effect. “Critics” who make a living knocking perfectly good products are not deserving of any recognition.

  29. Joe, you are missing one more point. A device like this will let you have a smoother throttle response every single time you press the accelerator. Flooring the accelerator every single time to get the desired is not a feasible option in real life though maybe a logical one. Everyone am sure, including you though you may deny, would appreciate a better throttle response than flooring the accelerator. Also using the device does not increase any jerks, it translates to a much smoother response compared to flooring the accelerator which may have jerks.

    By the way I use a similar product by the name of PedalTune and drive a stick shift and donot race.

    • Haha so increasing rate of change makes it smoother. Brilliant!

      • You may laugh as much as you want. There isn’t a single person here who have used it and said it doesn’t work. Maybe you should borrow one and use it to see if it works. It’s plug and play so you don’t need any modifications. Without that and harping on the research you have done, you are just losing credibility. There must me something there since so many users are vouching for it.

      • I’m not disputing that people like it, or at least say they like it to validate their spending. But to suggest it makes throttle control smoother blows my mind.

        How do you define smooth? Science defines it as low rate of change. Sprint booster increases rate of change which might pose a problem for your suggestion.

      • Maybe this link will help you. Based on your observations it is not that when you press the accelerator 50%, the ECU thinks you have pressed it 100%. There is no change in the amount of throttle being opened but how fast it opens. Due to warranty issues and also fuel efficiency figure norms, the throttle opens at its own pace as programmed by the ECU unlike older generation cars which just had the cable and no ECU to control it. This device fools the ECU into opening the throttle faster. If that is actually achieve, the throttle response ‘ logically’ will be faster and that cannot be achieved by flooring the accelerator.

        Hope this clarifies 🙂

      • Haha this is hilarious yeah sprint booster marketing video clarifies everything thanks for that. Now I understand. Especially the LEDs lighting up gave me great insight into how it works. The different colours were very pretty.

        Apologies for harsh response but you do realize this is a technical article based on science and you’ve linked to marketing rubbish? Quite out of context with respect to the article.

        Did you read the article or try to understand how throttle by wire works?

  30. Hi Joe – curious to know your thoughts about this product: http://www.ozbushelectronics.com.au/

    • Hey feraldisco he claims 30% improvement in fuel economy, which isn’t possible, and claims disabling egr improves max power. Which is interesting coz egr is fully closed under anything more than light load. It’s pretty much accepted that egr does not limit power. Even vendors that sell blanking plates admit it. So he’s full of crap. No need to investigate further. Straight out lying.

      Looks like he bought some bits off jcar and made something that fools the ecu into dumping more or less fuel depending on the position of a 50 cent potentiometer. By the way you already have capability of dumping less fuel by pressing the accelerator pedal less, so any suggested fuel saving by moving the dial to a negative value you are already capable of stock standard.

  31. this is correct. 100% agree with you . it only changes voltage sent to ecu. full stop ! most post on internet makes dumb people feels like experts.

    • Sure it works. Unless you all prefer to press the pedal like you are working out at the gym on the leg press machine with considerable effort and movement. Lol

  32. Thankyou for you review
    Very factual
    I purchased an idrive in australia and am having trouble with the supplier admitting all that you have written
    They offer a 30 day money back
    Im trying to get them to offer 90 days
    Wish me luck with that !

  33. Hey Joe, I have 2016 manual Toyota Corolla. The throttle response is dreadful. My main complaint is it holds on to the revs too long when performing a gear change so when you depress the clutch (after taking your foot off the accelerator) the engine screams because the revs haven’t had a chance to drop. I should add that this is under normal driving conditions with gear changes taking place at no more 3000 rpm. Toyota NZ have examined the vehicle and say its perfectly normal. I’m not looking for increased performance I want the throttle revs to drop down quicker than they are currently doing. I really wonder whether Sprint Booster could achieve this. Paul

    • Hey Paul yeah I noticed the same thing driving my sister’s corolla. The way the rpm ramps down is controlled by the ECU. Sprint booster can’t do anything. Best off mastering the system you’ve got and saving a few hundred bucks. You’ll get used to it I reckon.

  34. Thanks Outbackjoe I will take your advice, I too think its a mapping issue with the ECU but I just wanted to be sure first.

  35. Ive only one issue with your article; your assumption that the factory throttle mapping (if viewed as an xy plot) is linear. having played with ecu’s for many years (taught to tune by Haltech) its my experience that this isnt always so. Ill nominate my 2016 Disco 4 as an example. the first cm of throttle travel does nothing. its like you haven’t pushed the throttle at all. then its a mad rush as it reacts to whats likely a logarithmic step in voltage. I think this device will fix that issue, and im willing to try it or one similar to see as the “lag” isnt really lag, its a dead spot that gives very precise control at low throttle input. its ridiculous in daily driving though, ive nearly had an accident from trying to pull into traffic and it hasn’t done what i wanted it to.

    not many throttle maps are truly linear. perhaps this device just makes the throttle pedal more linear than factory. that would explain peoples confidence in them..

    • Wow that sounds like a serious safety issue. It’s a wonder you even survived. I can’t believe that anyone in this world can safely accelerate into traffic with anything less than 180kW.

      You should learn what a few hundred million other people have mastered – push the pedal a bit more.

      I’ll put some wiggles in the lines for you to make it non linear. Doesn’t really matter. Whatever shape the curve is, sprint booster compresses it into less pedal travel.

      So are you saying sprint booster is good only for certain vehicles? Does the sprint booster vendors provide a list of vehicles that already have a pretty linear profile where the benefit is not there? Coz my hilux throttle feels perfectly linear yet there’s a butt load of people in the hilux community who think sprint booster improves throttle response. It seems that it’s more related to placebo, confirmation bias and addiction to spending rather than specific throttle characteristics of certain vehicles.

  36. Watch the video to see what it does.

    You didn’t mention what the product actually does.

  37. Wow, now those comments are an interesting read. Looking at them, perhaps it is a very, very slight misunderstanding of the two opposing sides to this. But I think we can agree on a few things with regard to the various ‘pedal/throttle/speed accessories’: –

    1) Each device is essentially a voltage signal amplifier.
    2) Each device is able to boost/amplify (or subdue/reduce) the standard signal coming from the accelerator peddle.
    3) There are variations in types, with the amplification being either linear or some kind of curve.
    4) The result, by product definition, adjusts the standard relationship between pedal position and engine speed control (throttle-position).
    5) The characteristics of the adjusted pedal can, in some cases, be easy to duplicate by pressing or releasing the standard pedal at a different rate.
    6) The characteristics of the adjusted pedal can, in some cases, be very difficult to repeatedly duplicate by pressing or releasing the standard pedal at a different rate.
    7) The overall effect of such an adjustment in general can be perceived as a more responsive car.

    Aside from maybe some niggles on my wording, I hope that it is difficult to argue with the list. I find that the original article is good in pointing out what the product is, essentially a means to adjust the relationship between pedal position and engine speed. I also find that many of the responses are correct, that the adjusted relationship helps people drive the vehicle better according to their own style.

    Let’s use an example to illustrate another two sides: a manual gearbox. One can have a long-throw floor stick-shift type that takes some real working with ones arm to change gear. Then, we can have a paddle-shift, using a finger. The paddle-shift is a sophisticated amplification system where, instead of using a whole arm, one can use a finger. I dare so say that both types have their place, and you will have one side saying their method is better than the other. Neither is right or wrong.

    How about an example of people: a Formula 1 driver will ask his mechanics to have the accelerator pedal ‘mapped’ (adjust the relationship of pedal position to engine speed) in order to better match their style of driving. Some want low amplification on initial pedal press followed by increased amplification as they press further, some want linear all the way through the range, and some want initial high implication with tail-off towards the end of travel. Regardless, a good idea to be able to tune it.

    So, what are we left with. Seems like both sides are happy pointing out their arguments for and against the use of such devices. I think, so long as people are aware of what the devices are and are not, yet they are happy that the new pedal response suits their driving style/requirements, then both sides should be able to live in harmony, you think…?


  38. PS…

    And as a final part if this. The reason I am looking into it is because I have a Landcruiser V8 TD Auto 6-Speed, and by reputation, and in practice, when stopped, there is most definitely a perceptible ‘delay’ between the time I ‘plant’ my right foot and the card moving forward, I’d say 1-2 seconds.

    I find that most likely, a device that adjusts the amplification for my pedal position will not on its own ‘fix’ this delay. There is more going on here: I am on the brakes, then my right foot moves off the break, and floors the accelerator pedal, but no matter what the engine is doing, even if it could come to full speed immediately (which I am sure the ECU won’t allow anyway), the thing is, I have a torque converter, and going between hardly engaged to fully engaged is likely what is holding up the operation.

    So, what I do, if I wish to get away at the lights real quick, is ‘double-pedal’… a very bad practice. Hold the brake on the left-foot, and very slightly engage the torque-converter by slightly depressing the accelerator pedal. Yes, likely adding some TC wear, but in this state, it’s all primed, so releasing the brake and flooring the right foot at the same time gives almost instant response.

    So, what I want out of one of these devices is as follows, should I choose to select that mode: –
    1. Not pressing the accelerator, very slightly increase the pedal sensor output voltage from standard idle position.
    2. On pressing the accelerator pedal, use an s-curve to amplify my initial press, but on pressing further decrease amplification, so as to allow smooth acceleration all the way to the end of travel.
    3. And while we’re at it, give me another mode when I want a lot of pedal control such as when fine control is needed crawling over rocks, with decreased amplification on initial pressing of the accelerator.

    So, Personally see a great use for these devices. They just gotta get a bit more intelligent with them…

  39. So you missed the part about the reduction in 0 to 60 ? Or was that not addressed because you have no answer ?

    • Not sure what you mean, most of my post was in response to 0-60. The manufacturer says it wont improve 0-60. Pretty bloody good answer. The laws of physics say a sprint booster’s scope is limited to accelerator pedal position and therefore won’t improve 0-60. Also pretty good answer. Where do you address my questions?

  40. Joe, go buy one. Why are you so afraid to do this ? Is it because you might be wrong ? I know what I feel in the car and there is no way to replicate that by pressing the gas pedal “faster”. I tested that numerous times and I already told you the results. Sometimes theories are wrong no matter how hard you try to prove them right. Real life is the great equalizer, not a piece of paper a calculator and a computer. Joe, did you know on paper and in theory there is a cure for cancer ? In reality do we have a cure for cancer ? Do you think all of these reviews from all of these people are wrong ? After you have bought one, and used all of your infinite wisdom in a live and real test on pavement, not paper, then respond. But until then, I am not going to waste more time on this. The next post from you should be about the real test. Thanks, it’s been amusing.

    • Haha yeah I’ve seen that bit of paper with the cure for cancer, it blew past my desk last week. Your credibility skyrocketed with that awesome analogy.

      Yep I’m afraid just like I’m afraid to buy George Foreman’s ultimate super grill or the deluxe ab blaster plus.

      You think sprint booster manufacturers are wrong about their own product?

      You think that something that sits between the accelerator pedal transducer and the accelerator pedal position input to the ECU is capable of doing more than simply altering the accelerator pedal position?

      Can you buy it for me?

  41. lmao….sounds like Brokies Energy Polariser…..which uses crystals and magnets to align molecules of the car.
    Only real way to get better acceleration/performance/resposiveness…..is to tune it to its optimal settings
    Some small gains,not those 30% gains some products claim bs, are ECU remapping with a programmable setting.s,via a flash tuner

    However,the only true way is even with all the computor controlled cars is the old way,port and polish of manifold,blue printing the engine to the level you want,different cams,gigger valves,high compression pistons etc,etc or slap a turbo or supercharger on your motor….even then its best to beef up the internals of motor like conrods,big and little ends etc to cater for the greater poweroutput and even better strengthen the diff and transmission/gearbox….

    It takes a 15% increase in power for most people to notice it aa a seat of the pants experience

  42. I have to say that your analysis is quite wrong. I did a full evaluation on a different brand and the results differ entirely to your desktop analysis: http://australianimage.com.au/index.php/electronic-throttle-controller/.

    There is no point in effectively reviewing a product if you don’t actually have the product to review.

    • Hey Ray I don’t see where my article is in conflict with yours. All you say is you like the throttle feel. Where am I wrong? How does it work?

      Desktop analysis is probably better than placebo analysis.

  43. You appear to be suggesting that there are no tangible benefits to an electronic throttle controller, effectively saying that they are snake oil and a waste of money. I was dubious myself, but in actual use they provide very tangible/real benefits indeed. The electronic throttle controller totally changes the way the throttle operates, not just feel, though of course ‘feel’ is all part of the driving experience.

    On road, with my vehicle at least, drivability has been substantially improved and, as I said in my review, I would not be without it anymore as the improvement is so significant. But it’s in off-road conditions where the electronic throttle controller really comes into its own. I know of people that are putting pieces of sponge and the like under the accelerator pedal to try an stop the erratic movement due to jolting etc; whereas, with the electronic throttle controller, you gain full control. The safety aspect reason alone for having one, if you go off-road.

    Obviously an electronic throttle controller will work differently with different vehicles, so your mileage may vary, but anyone with a heavy 4WD and diesel engine will likely benefit greatly.

    • I’m not suggesting anything like that. I just explain how it works and the advantages and disadvantages.

      What do you mean by “improved driveability”? Even on your article you have a schematic of the throttle circuit. The sprint booster sits between the accelerator pedal sensor and the accelerator pedal input of the ECU. You agree all it does is alter the accelerator position that the ECU receives? Same as pushing the pedal more or less?

  44. The electronic throttle controller allows the throttle to become more or less responsive. This is what is so often done with performance cars and the like, providing more responsiveness to the throttle. The throttle controller allows small throttle inputs to have the same effect as large ones if not using a controller, which gives you much better control in performance situations. Simply pushing the throttle harder or further is not the same, especially since most electronic throttles have an inherent hysteresis.

    At the opposite end, when you’re bouncing about on a rough track, with the normal throttle, your foot is constantly moving the throttle up and down making it impossible to keep the throttle in one position. As I said, many people resort to foam pads or try and lock their foot to the firewall to prevent this inadvertent throttle movement. With the electronic throttle controller, large throttle movements are interpreted as small ones and this eliminates all jolting or rabbit hopping.

    From my point of view, there are no disadvantages to one of these electronic throttle controllers, especially given that you have full control on how it’s set and used. I consider this one of the best things that I’ve bought for my Patrol and it’s definitely money well spent, if for nothing more than the off-road control.

    • My foot can also become more or less responsive depending on the signals my brain sends it. And I enjoy using my brain and body to do stuff since it’s the only way I have of experiencing the world.

      In this universe everything is a compromise. If someone says “no disadvantages” it’s an immediate red flag that something’s amiss.

      Isn’t the cost of it a disadvantage? Now you can do less of whatever it is you enjoy. What about, if you have it turned on, but needed immediate fine control. Isn’t that a disadvantage? What if you break traction when you didn’t want to?

      Don’t you think it’s funny that, prior to getting the gizmo, you thought the throttle was too responsive, yet now you think it’s simultaneously too responsive and not responsive enough? It’s solved a problem you didn’t know you had. This is a typical response to a lifetime of consumer culture training. Confirm everything the marketing says.

      I think the throttle response on my vehicle is prefect. Combine this with my perfectly functioning foot and brain yields ultimate throttle control. No problems on the road. No problems off road.

  45. The cost is absolutely minimal in the scheme of things and it actually enhances what I enjoy doing, that is, driving. There is no such thing as requiring ‘immediate’ fine control, that happens between my brain and appendages while driving. That’s why I so enjoy the throttle controller, because the throttle now reacts like I want it to react.

    You misunderstand what I mean by too responsive. My original intent was to reduce the over-sensitivity while off-roading, it has achieved this and then some. As a secondary benefit, it actually illustrated that the inherent hysteresis of the throttle pedal to throttle actuator was restricting responsiveness in normal driving situations. I’d become accustomed to the inherent lag of the normal throttle.

    After more than 40 years of driving, vehicle modifications, building engines, programming fuel injection systems etc, I have an intimate relationship with every vehicle that I’ve owned. The problem is that you haven’t tried one of these electronic throttle controllers, so everything that you suggest is mere supposition. The final thing is that you can’t extrapolate your experiences, in your vehicle, in your driving conditions, to that of others.

    • What hysteresis are you talking about? And how can a resistor have hysteresis?

      “Cost is small in the scheme of things”. Apply that philosophy consistently and you are poor, work hard your whole to buy shit, then die.

      It’s hardly a complicated system to analyze. It’s like increasing sensitivity on the mouse pointer on a computer. I don’t need to test every computer in the world to know that it makes the pointer move faster but makes it harder to make small motions.

      What do you mean no such things as requiring immediate fine control? Now you’re losing credibility. If you want smooth but get jerky that’s bad. If you admit the slower response can be an advantage then surely when you have it in fast mode you need to acknowledge that you lose the advantage of slow mode?

  46. Hysteresis – ‘the phenomenon in which the value of a physical property lags behind changes in the effect causing it’. There is often a delay between applying the throttle and the throttle assembly reacting. Remember, the accelerator assembly and throttle are electromechanical devices that are controlled via the car’s ECU. So there’s a series of signals to be processed before anything happens, a common complaint amongst many vehicle brands eg: https://forums.justcommodores.com.au/threads/ve-sadness-electronic-throttle.132989/.

    It is a complicated system, a cable operated throttle system is simple. Because the ECU is often calculating a number of engine variables, throttle input may not be actioned as you would like it, the throttle controller is a way to override this delayed processing. Then what did you mean by ‘but needed immediate fine control’? To me you were implying that by having an electronic throttle control that overrode the factory one somehow impeded vehicle control, it doesn’t.

    In certain circumstances, as I’ve described, a slow response to throttle inputs is a good thing. In other circumstances, rapid response to throttle inputs is a good thing. It’s entirely situation dependent. If you actually ever get a chance to try one of these units, even if in someone else’s vehicle, you’ll understand the differences and the impact it has on real world driveability. But remember, every vehicle will react differently to one of these throttle controllers.

    • Haha dude this is not the right forum to try to make some bullshit up about hysteresis. Hysteresis means dependant on its history, or dependant on where its come from. This usually manifests as a changing relationship depending on whether coming from high to low or low to high. It would be like having the throttle very sensitive as you push it down but then becoming very insensitive as you lift off. It means that, at a given pedal position, you could have different responses depending on how you got to that pedal position. Hysteresis is not a function of time and so is not related to time delays. Hysteresis has to do with the relationship between an input and an output. A hysteresis delay or lag means a phase shift between the input and the output, but there is no time delay. Rate dependent hysteresis means the phase shift depends on input frequency. The definition you quote, although being google’s top definition, is poorly articulated and too specific to phase shift hysteresis. Read the Wikipedia article, it explains it better.

      I think you mean ECU filtering, or more generally ECU processing. Anyway, whatever you want to call it, can you explain how a sprint booster can circumvent the “hysteresis” or delay to processing if the sprint booster output is the accelerator pedal position input to the ECU? The delay is happening in the ECU, after the sprint booster. How can it be possible for the sprint booster to circumvent that delay?

      What happens if you have it in fast mode and you encounter a situation when slow is better? Like you hit a big bump on the highway. That’s a disadvantage? What about the fact that in fast mode your speed variability must increase on the highway, since the smallest adjustment you can make with your foot now translates to a larger change in speed. Another disadvantage?

      You invent bogus technical stuff to validate the product. You can’t explain how the pedal position input could bypass ECU processing. You claim the cost isn’t a significant factor to consider. You claim there is absolutely no disadvantage. You claim both speeding up and slowing down the response can be a benefit but then don’t admit that you must also lose the advantage of one when selecting the other. This tells me you have a bias, coz you’ve been trained that buying stuff is good, and you need to validate your buying.

      Yes sprint boosters are perfect in every possible way and have no compromises and you’re very clever for getting one.

  47. I’ve said my peace. You prefer not to accept what I know from experience and that’s your choice, so there’s no point in me continuing further. Your readers can make up their own mind about this issue. Thanks for at least allowing me to present my case.

  48. Hey Joe – Are you going to try out that free Sprint Booster we sent you and update this article with your thoughts? Sure would be nice. Hope you publish this comment.

  49. Here is a video review from someone that actually tried the Sprint Booster: https://youtu.be/Bbn7hI1kpA0

    • I think the dude gets it wrong where he suggests it opens the throttle faster even though the throttle opening is controlled by the ECU independent of the sprint booster. What do you think?

      • All I know is that on my Mercedes when I’m sitting at a stoplight and I want to make a quick turn in front of oncoming traffic and I step quickly on the gas pedal I get a flat spot (lag) before the car moves. Have you ever had that o’shit feeling when cars are coming at you? All I know is that after I installed the Sprint Booster that lag is gone and I feel a lot more comfortable when turning in front of oncoming cars.

      • Haha yeah I’m sure the hundreds of kW of power that your merc has is just not enough to be comfortable accelerating into traffic, you poor thing. People with anything less must be nervous wrecks!

        I’m always comfortable. Along with a few hundred million other people, we must be part of an elite group of people with an amazing ability to move our foot quickly.

  50. Installed a sprint booster on a 2007 Mini Cooper S and it really seem to remove the lag or delay from the pedal to the throttle body. What I’ve noticed is the pedal travels less and it seems to be more responsive. Testing this off/street/race toggled settings. Everyone may have different results with each application. I think it made a difference in my application of this product.

  51. Can you please explain why the car manufacturers are using the so called ‘sport buttons’ to enhance the throttle response (among other stuff ) ? why would they do it if there is no lag and what do they do differently?

    • When does anyone say there is no lag?

      Sport button is an input to the ecu. It could be programed to do anything, whatever the manufacturer wants it to do. Sprint booster hangs off the accelerator pedal position input. That input does what it’s programmed to do whether a sprint booster is there or not.

      • when you say ‘whatever the manufacturer wants to do’ what do you mean? what exactly does a sport button do differently in terms of results in the response? i’m not asking how it does it (direct input to the ecu) i’m asking what’s the final effect in throttle response different than Sprint Booster

      • So an input to the ecu can do anything according to what it’s programed to do. Maybe the manufacturer uses it to reduce the strength of the filter that dampens the throttle response. Maybe they use it to hold gears longer. Stiffen the suspension. Bypass emission systems. Anything.

        A sprint booster changes the accelerator pedal position but cannot change any of the above. Similarly moving the accelerator pedal changes the accelerator pedal position but can’t change any of the above.

        Can’t you figure this out by giving it some thought for two minutes and applying some basic logic? There’s a processor with inputs and outputs and software in the middle.

  52. i’m asking about the final outcome in response, not how they do it and of course i’m only referring to throttle response not the other stuff (suspension, steering wheel, transmission…etc) that many of these systems do additionally . Why wouldn’t you just press the pedal further in this case?

    • Coz pushing the pedal further can’t affect the ecu software that governs the throttle response. Same as sprint booster, since a sprint booster’s only interface to the ECU is accelerator pedal position.

      How could you possibly think that manipulating one input could have the same effect as another input programed to do something completely different?

      Suggesting that a sprint booster can circumvent the ecu processing that controls the throttle response is no different to suggesting it can stiffen the suspension.

      • You are saying that pressing the pedal further can’t affect the software on the throttle response which i agree, what if you press the pedal faster? does ECU consider the rate of angle change as a factor to open the throttle quicker or not?

      • Yes of course, up to the limit of which the ECU software allows. That’s why a sprint booster can maybe save you 0.1s or less, at the expense of not being able to feather the throttle. It’s all clearly articulated in the article. Maybe read the article and try to understand it rather than bloating the comments with repetition.

  53. I read the article, but you just said that ”Suggesting a sprint booster can circumvent the ecu processing that controls the throttle response is no different to suggesting it can stiffen the suspension” and the same time you agree that the ECU considers the angular speed as a factor to open the throttle quicker.

    • Yes both are true, its all in the article. That’s why pushing the accelerator pedal hard makes the car go faster. Who ever tried to deny that? Do I really need to spell this out?

      • but those 2 statements you made are exactly the opposite (no need to spell this out) it either affects the response or not. If the ECU opens the throttle faster when reading a faster angular speed then providing a faster angular speed to the ECU should result in a faster throttle opening.

      • No they’re not opposite. Man this is tiresome. Did you get your logic training from Chief Wiggum? Speed that you change the accelerator pedal input does not change the ECU software. However the ECU software is configured to respond to the accelerator pedal input. It responds in exactly the same way whether a sprint booster is connected or not. That’s why when you press the pedal harder the car goes faster. That’s why, at best, a sprint booster might improve the throttle opening time by 0.1s, because it saves some pedal travel time, at the expense of not being able to feather the throttle.

        Let me be completely clear, to avoid going around in more circles.

        1. Sprint booster cannot change ECU software.
        2. Sprint booster can reduce pedal travel time to reach 100% accelerator pedal position by perhaps 0.1s, at the expense of not being able to feather the throttle.

  54. Back in the day, cars used throttle cables that connected the gas pedal to the carburetor. You stepped on the gas pedal half way the throttle immediately opened to half way. Same if you floored the gas pedal, the throttle was instantly opened all the way. Now here comes computers and drive-by-wire. Now when you step on the pedal half way the throttle doesn’t open instantly to half way it opens to half way at a predetermined rate. Same thing when you floor it, you punch the pedal to the floor and the throttle doesn’t open instantly, it opens based on the predetermined settings. What the sprint booster does depending on what setting you use, it takes away that predetermined setting so it’s more like having a throttle cable again.

    • How does it do that? Do you realize that a sprint booster sits between the accelerator pedal transducer and the accelerator pedal position input to the ECU? And that any throttle control is governed by the ECU software which the accelerator pedal position input cannot circumvent? Did you read the article?

  55. If ECU reads faster rate (harder acceleration as you say) it will open the throttle faster , that clearly means that if you provide a faster rate to the ECU (whether this is a fast foot or a sprint booster) the throttle will open faster, it will not change the software (i never said it does) , the software will do what is supposed to do, read the rate and act accordingly (opens faster the throttle or slower). i can’t see why you claim that it responds the same whether a sprint booster is connected or not.

    • If the input to the ECU changes from 0 to 100% in 1 second the ECU will respond the same whether that input was received from the sprint booster or directly from the position transducer.

      If, with a sprint booster, you change the position from 0 to 100% in 0.5s, then without the sprint booster, with more pedal travel, you can also change the position from 0 to 100% in 0.5s, and the result is exactly the same.

      James this conversation is too dumb for me. Everything we’ve discussed can be explained by reading the article and applying some common sense. How many times must I repeat that sprint booster might improve throttle response by the amount of time you save having to move your foot a bit more? That is the only possible advantage. It can’t bypass ECU software.

      What happened to your “sport mode” argument? That didn’t work so you replaced that with inability to follow some basic logic? That’s how desperate you are to support sprint boosters?

  56. No matter how many times you repeat it you are just missing the whole point of this product… We are not talking about 0 to100% , the point of this product is not to make better track times by saving you the time to floor the pedal. The point of this product is the response in the low to mid range where the problem occurs in daily driving conditions.
    If this it too dumb for you to understand I’m stopping here.. it must be too boring knowing everything

    • The values 0 to 100% are irrelevant. The point is whatever you do with sprint booster you can do without it by moving your foot quicker. Give me a sprint booster output – say x. Without a sprint booster I can give you the same output x with appropriate positioning of the accelerator pedal. This is true for 0 ≤ x ≤ 100.

      Ok, in relation to your last comment, please answer these three specific questions and nothing else.

      1. What problem occurs?
      2. How does sprint booster circumvent that problem?
      3. How is it better than moving your foot more?

  57. ”The point is whatever you do with sprint booster you can do without it by moving your foot quicker”

    Haha Really?? Can you press your foot really fast and stop at 1/3 of the peal travel? You must have a step motor instead of foot but that’s just you . The normal ‘dumb’ human can’t .

    P.S It’s funny how you edit your previous posts after my reply,
    You wrote after my reply : ”What happened to your “sport mode” argument? That didn’t work so you replaced that with inability to follow some basic logic? That’s how desperate you are to support sprint boosters? ” (!)

    Desperate? C’mon… The ‘sport mode’ argument still remains, i still didn’t get any answer on what’s the results from using the ‘sport button’ in throttle response… Maybe it is a placebo effect as well (btw .. Placebo ?… really?)

    I’m done here, i can’t waste my time anymore

    • Yes really, apart from the extra pedal travel time.

      Yeah I didn’t answer you about sports mode. Your credibility is soaring.

      If you are targeting 1/3 throttle you can do it better without a sprint booster. Whatever error you have in your foot position, it will translate to greater error with sprint booster. The time to get from 0 to 1/3 accelerator pedal position is probably in the order of 2/10 of a second. The time to get from say 0 to 1/6 accelerator position might be around 1/10 of a second. So a 1/10 of a second time saving, but greater error in position. That’s a best case saving, it’s probably less, coz you need to hold your ankle stiff and move slowly to avoid overshooting. Additionally low pass filters will filter faster signals more, so the actual time saving is even less again.

      Yeah this whole session has been fairly wasteful, nothing new was brought to the table, same old logic defying stuff.

  58. Hi there.
    I have a rev high throttle controller fitted on my 2010 fg xr8. I tested it in all modes…ie economy and sports. I found that in the sports modes especially sp7 through to sp11 the engine has a faster response and acceleration. So i put it back to normal and so not to fool myself actually uninstalled it and then dumped the accelerator to the floor. I found that the engine still had good response but didn’t accelerate through the rpm as quick as before when it was connected. I am happy with my controller and yes in sport modes it does use more fuel. In economy 7 mode you can push your foot to the floor and takes off like a granny does…slowly. I have a friend that has one fitted to his VF Commodore and his tuner put it on a dyno and told him that the controller on sp11 literally flips it open very rapidy and economy mode very slowly. It’s like it is a electronic version of a cable connected throttle body. Anyways thise that like it enjoy…those that don’t then get refunded.

    Kind regards

  59. Hey Joe. Looks like somebody sent you one of these fro free over 2 months ago. Have you tried it? It would be great to know what you thought.

    Based on your technical assessment your logic seems sound, but are you certain that the pedal’s variable resistor is such a simple device as you think? Could there be additional electronics in it on some vehicle models? Or could there some mechanical movement properties in the pedal movement that have an effect that we are all unaware of or haven’t considered?

    My Hyundai iLoad DI diesel only suffers an effect that feels like turbo lag when I floor the accelerator quickly, never when I take a longer time to get the accelerator to the floor. Any idea why this would be? If a throttle controller could fix this then it would be worth it to me. People’s experiences appear to indicate that this is exactly what these throttle controls eliminate. I wouldn’t care about how it does it, as long as it actually does it.

    I’m not disputing anything you’ve said, I am genuinely trying to evaluate whether I should get one or not. I think that a follow up by yourself after trying the free one you have been sent would go a long way to help people make a decisive choice.

    • hi all
      ive been looking into these myself and having read all above i feel there is a misunderstanding of the standard type,over the years ive owned bmw 320 4 speed box,lancia hf turbo mk 1,escort rs turbo,and driven many modified ford cosworths and mitsubushi lancer mr&mrfq standard and highly modified but the first vauxhall meriva 1.6 8v (family man now lol) and the vauxhall meriva 1.6 16v i own now has a totally different relationship in terms of throttle response,you feel it more when cruising between 55-70 mph.

      if you dip your foot to overtake you have to wait 1-1.5 seconds before any thing actually happens and when it does move the drive is spoilt and not nice atall.

      taking off 0-60 to get it flying if you like you have to be a little heavier footed which gives you the feeling its being screwed more than need be or to put another way the foot shouldnt have to go so low its just something you feel in feed back from foot,accelerater and engine,those who are at 1 with a car will understand,its not a engine prob its just how the accelarater is wired, if i put a cable on it (although not possible) i know for sure it would respond far better.

      on this model of car i can see how it can benefit the response and thats not to say it cant be responsive now but it has its moments when its not quite there,im questioning it but it aint cheep should i decide to buy ill see what the reurns policy is like and if good then i aint got nothing to loose in trying.

      just my 2 cents good day all

    • Hey Daniel yes the pedal position sensor is just a resistor, I have never seen anything to indicate otherwise, except for when people are clutching at straws trying to validate their sprint booster. It doesn’t matter anyway. I’ve over-simplified in the article. It doesn’t really matter where the filtering occurs. The problem is that the sprint booster is in series with the filtering. It can’t undo the filtering no matter what. If the filtering occurs in the pedal position sensor then information about pedal position is lost and cannot be recovered. The sprint booster would have no way of discriminating between moving the pedal slowly or quickly, it sees only the output from the filter. To try to undo the filtering would mean it also has to horribly overshoot if the pedal is moved slowly or reacting from noise. For a sprint booster to actually circumvent any delay, it needs to both register the accelerator position directly and also bypass the filter. Schematically it must be in parallel with the filter.

  60. Since you haven’t used one as stated, then I suggest you try before leaving a long elaborate idea or hypotheses , it works, quite well I might add. Yes, I have one In my Toyota .

  61. Have you really not tried the Sprint Booster yet? If it’s all bullshit like you claim it to be, I’d love for you to post a video supporting your above article. With the amount of depth you went into with this article, it shouldn’t take much time to demonstrate the hoax that is, this product. I try and follow the proper scientific method myself, but at some point you need to validate the hypothesis.

  62. Hi OBJ,
    Great article….. I came across your website when i was looking at Throttle control units on the 4WD Supacentre website and thought I would do a bit of investigating into their effectiveness or not. What you say makes perfect sense to me although not to others it would seem and that is fine as we all have our own opinions.
    So now to get to the point of this email and what started me on this path. My issue is turbo lag and how to get rid of it….I have a 2009 2.8 diesel auto Jeep Wrangler Unlimited (yes I bought a Jeep) and the lag almost boarders on dangerous at times. Do you have any suggestions (other than getting another vehicle) on how I can get rid of or minimise the lag?? Any help would be appreciated.
    Cheers Ozbob101

    • Hey Ozbob I dunno. A sprint booster won’t fix it any more than planting your foot but may give you the impression that it’s better. It could be inherent in the design and difficult to fix. A diesel performance chip might help. It will dump more fuel at low rpm which will make more power and create more exhaust for the turbo. I have an article on chips but can’t link to it coz I’m on my phone.

      Best option if you’re vehicle is simply a tool to achieve other things is to master what you’ve got. I know it’s easy to fall into the “it’s dangerous” camp to help justify things but there must be thousands of your vehicle on the road around the world mostly unmodified. Depends what you are trying to achieve. If it’s just safety then I reckon you’d be better off keeping your car stock, driving cautiously, slowly and defensively, not drink driving, not speeding, not tailgating, not driving aggressively, not driving tired, not taking unnecessary risks, not doing all the stuff that causes the vast majority of crashes, and mastering the system you have. I’ve never heard of an accident or fatality attributed to turbo lag.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s